Whirlpool WFO 3T141 X vs Cecotec 00224
WFO 3T141 X is 7% cheaper than 00224. WFO 3T141 X is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.7).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Height | 85 cm | 84.5 cm |
| Width | 60 cm | 60 cm |
| Depth | 59 cm | 60 cm |
| Place settings | 14 | — |
| Energy | ||
| Energy Class | C | — |
| Specific Features | ||
| Number of settings | 1 | — |
| Delay | Yes | Yes |
| Half load function | — | Yes |
| Other | ||
| Installation Type | Freestanding | — |
Frequently asked questions
- WFO 3T141 X or 00224: which is cheaper?
- WFO 3T141 X is 7% cheaper than 00224.
- WFO 3T141 X or 00224: which is rated better?
- WFO 3T141 X is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.7).

