Amica EKS 16171-1 vs Bomann KS 7251
EKS 16171-1 and KS 7251 are similarly priced. KS 7251 is rated higher (4.4 vs 3.9).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Capacity | 116 lt | 109 lt |
| Height | 87.1 cm | 85 cm |
| Width | 54 cm | 55 cm |
| Depth | 54 cm | 58 cm |
| Freezer Capacity | 16 lt | 14 lt |
| Appearance | ||
| Installation Type | Built-In | Freestanding |
| Number of Doors | 1 | 1 |
| Freezer Position | Top | Top |
| Color | White | White |
| Number of Shelves | 3 | — |
| Specific Features | ||
Frequently asked questions
- EKS 16171-1 or KS 7251: which is cheaper?
- EKS 16171-1 and KS 7251 are similarly priced, within 1% of each other.
- KS 7251 or EKS 16171-1: which is rated better?
- KS 7251 is rated higher (4.4 vs 3.9).
- Between EKS 16171-1 and KS 7251, which has more capacity?
- EKS 16171-1 has more capacity than KS 7251 (116 lt vs 109 lt).
- What's the difference in energy Class between EKS 16171-1 and KS 7251?
- EKS 16171-1 has energy Class E, while KS 7251 has energy Class C.
More questions about these products
- Does a larger fridge always use more energy?
- Not necessarily, but in most cases yes. Modern insulation and efficient compressors can reduce the difference, yet larger refrigerators still have more internal volume and greater heat-transfer area. If two models use similar technology, the smaller one will usually consume less electricity.
- What is a good annual energy consumption for a fridge?
- There is no single ideal value because consumption depends on size and features. However, when comparing refrigerators with similar capacity, a lower kWh/year rating generally indicates a more efficient appliance and lower operating costs.