Amica KGCR 387 101 B vs Samsung RT38CB6624C1ES
KGCR 387 101 B and RT38CB6624C1ES are similarly priced. RT38CB6624C1ES is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.8).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Capacity | 244 lt | — |
| Height | 181 cm | 171.5 cm |
| Width | 55 cm | 67.2 cm |
| Depth | 61.5 cm | 70 cm |
| Freezer Capacity | 63 lt | — |
| Appearance | ||
| Installation Type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Number of Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Freezer Position | Bottom | — |
| Number of Shelves | — | 4 |
| Specific Features | ||
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Frequently asked questions
- KGCR 387 101 B or RT38CB6624C1ES: which is cheaper?
- KGCR 387 101 B and RT38CB6624C1ES are similarly priced, within 1% of each other.
- RT38CB6624C1ES or KGCR 387 101 B: which is rated better?
- RT38CB6624C1ES is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.8).
- Between KGCR 387 101 B and RT38CB6624C1ES, which has more height?
- KGCR 387 101 B has more height than RT38CB6624C1ES (181 cm vs 171.5 cm).
- What's the difference in energy Class between KGCR 387 101 B and RT38CB6624C1ES?
- KGCR 387 101 B has energy Class D, while RT38CB6624C1ES has energy Class E.
- Between RT38CB6624C1ES and KGCR 387 101 B, which has more annual Energy Consumption?
- RT38CB6624C1ES has more annual Energy Consumption than KGCR 387 101 B (245 kWh/y vs 162 kWh/y).