Cecotec 01954 vs Samsung RS70F65QET
RS70F65QET is 2% cheaper than 01954. RS70F65QET is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Capacity | 436 lt | 654 lt |
| Height | 183 cm | — |
| Width | 83.6 cm | — |
| Depth | 63.6 cm | — |
| Freezer Capacity | 148 lt | 236 lt |
| Appearance | ||
| Installation Type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Number of Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Color | Steel | Inox |
| Number of Shelves | — | 4 |
| Specific Features | ||
| Compressor Type | ||
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Frequently asked questions
- RS70F65QET or 01954: which is cheaper?
- RS70F65QET is 2% cheaper than 01954.
- RS70F65QET or 01954: which is rated better?
- RS70F65QET is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1).
- Between RS70F65QET and 01954, which has more capacity?
- RS70F65QET has more capacity than 01954 (654 lt vs 436 lt).
- Between RS70F65QET and 01954, which has more freezer Capacity?
- RS70F65QET has more freezer Capacity than 01954 (236 lt vs 148 lt).
- Between 01954 and RS70F65QET, which has more annual Energy Consumption?
- 01954 has more annual Energy Consumption than RS70F65QET (252 kWh/y vs 225 kWh/y).