LG GBBSJ20DPY.APYQEUZ vs CANDY 34005578
GBBSJ20DPY.APYQEUZ and 34005578 are similarly priced. 34005578 is rated higher (4.6 vs 3.8).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Capacity | 375 lt | 377 lt |
| Height | 203 cm | 200 cm |
| Width | 67.4 cm | 59.5 cm |
| Depth | 59.7 cm | 65.8 cm |
| Freezer Capacity | 262 lt | 258 lt |
| Appearance | ||
| Installation Type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Number of Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Freezer Position | — | Bottom |
| Color | Silver | White |
| Number of Shelves | 3 | 5 |
| Specific Features | ||
Frequently asked questions
- GBBSJ20DPY.APYQEUZ or 34005578: which is cheaper?
- GBBSJ20DPY.APYQEUZ and 34005578 are similarly priced, within 1% of each other.
- 34005578 or GBBSJ20DPY.APYQEUZ: which is rated better?
- 34005578 is rated higher (4.6 vs 3.8).
- What's the difference in energy Class between GBBSJ20DPY.APYQEUZ and 34005578?
- GBBSJ20DPY.APYQEUZ has energy Class D, while 34005578 has energy Class E.
More questions about these products
- What is a good annual energy consumption for a fridge?
- There is no single ideal value because consumption depends on size and features. However, when comparing refrigerators with similar capacity, a lower kWh/year rating generally indicates a more efficient appliance and lower operating costs.