Samsung RF65DG9H0ESREF vs Samsung RS6HA8891SL/EF
RS6HA8891SL/EF is 25% cheaper than RF65DG9H0ESREF. RF65DG9H0ESREF is rated higher (4.5 vs 4).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Capacity | 636 lt | 614 lt |
| Height | 182.5 cm | 178 cm |
| Width | 91.2 cm | 91.2 cm |
| Depth | 72.3 cm | 71.6 cm |
| Freezer Capacity | 250 lt | 225 lt |
| Appearance | ||
| Installation Type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Number of Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Freezer Position | Bottom | — |
| Color | Steel | Steel |
| Number of Shelves | 12 | 8 |
| Specific Features | ||
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Frequently asked questions
- RS6HA8891SL/EF or RF65DG9H0ESREF: which is cheaper?
- RS6HA8891SL/EF is 25% cheaper than RF65DG9H0ESREF.
- RF65DG9H0ESREF or RS6HA8891SL/EF: which is rated better?
- RF65DG9H0ESREF is rated higher (4.5 vs 4).
- Between RF65DG9H0ESREF and RS6HA8891SL/EF, which has more capacity?
- RF65DG9H0ESREF has more capacity than RS6HA8891SL/EF (636 lt vs 614 lt).
- Between RF65DG9H0ESREF and RS6HA8891SL/EF, which has more freezer Capacity?
- RF65DG9H0ESREF has more freezer Capacity than RS6HA8891SL/EF (250 lt vs 225 lt).
- Between RF65DG9H0ESREF and RS6HA8891SL/EF, which has more annual Energy Consumption?
- RF65DG9H0ESREF has more annual Energy Consumption than RS6HA8891SL/EF (365 kWh/y vs 346 kWh/y).