Samsung RT38CB6624C1ES vs Samsung RB34C775CS9/EF
RT38CB6624C1ES and RB34C775CS9/EF are similarly priced. RB34C775CS9/EF is rated higher (4.4 vs 4.2).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Height | 171.5 cm | 185.3 cm |
| Width | 67.2 cm | 65.8 cm |
| Depth | 70 cm | 59.5 cm |
| Appearance | ||
| Installation Type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Number of Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Freezer Position | — | Bottom |
| Number of Shelves | 4 | 3 |
| Specific Features | ||
| Compressor Type | rotary | rotary_scroll |
| Energy | ||
| Energy Class | E | C |
| BEE Star Rating | ||
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Frequently asked questions
- RT38CB6624C1ES or RB34C775CS9/EF: which is cheaper?
- RT38CB6624C1ES and RB34C775CS9/EF are similarly priced, within 1% of each other.
- RB34C775CS9/EF or RT38CB6624C1ES: which is rated better?
- RB34C775CS9/EF is rated higher (4.4 vs 4.2).
- Between RB34C775CS9/EF and RT38CB6624C1ES, which has more height?
- RB34C775CS9/EF has more height than RT38CB6624C1ES (185.3 cm vs 171.5 cm).
- What's the difference in energy Class between RT38CB6624C1ES and RB34C775CS9/EF?
- RT38CB6624C1ES has energy Class E, while RB34C775CS9/EF has energy Class C.
- Between RT38CB6624C1ES and RB34C775CS9/EF, which has more annual Energy Consumption?
- RT38CB6624C1ES has more annual Energy Consumption than RB34C775CS9/EF (245 kWh/y vs 163 kWh/y).