Caso MCG 25 Ceramic Chef 3351 vs Bomann MWG 3001 H EB
MCG 25 Ceramic Chef 3351 is 2% cheaper than MWG 3001 H EB. MWG 3001 H EB is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.8).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Capacity | 25 lt | 25 lt |
| Height | 28.5 cm | 39 cm |
| Width | 49 cm | — |
| Depth | 48 cm | — |
| Turntable Diameter | 31.5 cm | 27.0 cm |
| Energy | ||
| Wattage | 2050 W | 2200 W |
| Energy consumption | 900 W | — |
| Appearance | ||
| Color | Silver | Silver |
| Installation Type | Freestanding | Built-In |
| Input Type | Buttons, Mouse | |
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Frequently asked questions
- MCG 25 Ceramic Chef 3351 or MWG 3001 H EB: which is cheaper?
- MCG 25 Ceramic Chef 3351 is 2% cheaper than MWG 3001 H EB.
- MWG 3001 H EB or MCG 25 Ceramic Chef 3351: which is rated better?
- MWG 3001 H EB is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.8).
- Between MWG 3001 H EB and MCG 25 Ceramic Chef 3351, which has more wattage?
- MWG 3001 H EB has more wattage than MCG 25 Ceramic Chef 3351 (2200 W vs 2050 W).