Panasonic NN-GT65QBEPG vs CANDY MIC 20 GDFX
MIC 20 GDFX is 2% cheaper than NN-GT65QBEPG. MIC 20 GDFX is rated higher (4.4 vs 3.8).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Capacity | 31 lt | 20 lt |
| Height | 31 cm | 38.8 cm |
| Width | 52.5 cm | 34.3 cm |
| Depth | 40.1 cm | 38.8 cm |
| Turntable Diameter | — | 24.5 cm |
| Energy | ||
| Energy Class | — | F |
| Wattage | 1000 W | 1250 W |
| Energy consumption | — | 800 W |
| Appearance | ||
| Color | Black | Steel |
| Installation Type | ||
Frequently asked questions
- MIC 20 GDFX or NN-GT65QBEPG: which is cheaper?
- MIC 20 GDFX is 2% cheaper than NN-GT65QBEPG.
- MIC 20 GDFX or NN-GT65QBEPG: which is rated better?
- MIC 20 GDFX is rated higher (4.4 vs 3.8).
- Between NN-GT65QBEPG and MIC 20 GDFX, which has more capacity?
- NN-GT65QBEPG has more capacity than MIC 20 GDFX (31 lt vs 20 lt).
- Between MIC 20 GDFX and NN-GT65QBEPG, which has more wattage?
- MIC 20 GDFX has more wattage than NN-GT65QBEPG (1250 W vs 1000 W).