Samsung BE50FX-H vs Cello CTRAV- 27TZF
BE50FX-H and CTRAV- 27TZF are similarly priced. CTRAV- 27TZF is rated higher (3.7 vs 2.8).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Height | 64.4 cm | 42 cm |
| Screen Size | 50 in | 27 in |
| Width | 111.8 cm | 68 cm |
| VESA Mount | — | 100 x 100 mm |
| Image Quality | ||
| Display Technology | LED | LED |
| Refresh Rate | 75 | 60 |
| Display Resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Contrast Ratio | — | 4000 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 3 | |
Frequently asked questions
- BE50FX-H or CTRAV- 27TZF: which is cheaper?
- BE50FX-H and CTRAV- 27TZF are similarly priced, within 1% of each other.
- CTRAV- 27TZF or BE50FX-H: which is rated better?
- CTRAV- 27TZF is rated higher (3.7 vs 2.8).
- What's the difference in refresh Rate between BE50FX-H and CTRAV- 27TZF?
- BE50FX-H has refresh Rate 75, while CTRAV- 27TZF has refresh Rate 60.
- What's the difference in energy Class between BE50FX-H and CTRAV- 27TZF?
- BE50FX-H has energy Class G, while CTRAV- 27TZF has energy Class E.