TCL 32V4C vs Metz 32MQH7000Z
32V4C is 14% cheaper than 32MQH7000Z. 32V4C is rated higher (4.3 vs 4).
Specifications
| Dimensions | ||
| Height | 46.5 cm | — |
| Screen Size | 32 in | — |
| Width | 71.5 cm | — |
| VESA Mount | 200 x 200 mm | 200 x 100 mm |
| Image Quality | ||
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Display Technology | QLED | QLED |
| Refresh Rate | 120 | 60 |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Ethernet Port | Yes | |
Frequently asked questions
- 32V4C or 32MQH7000Z: which is cheaper?
- 32V4C is 14% cheaper than 32MQH7000Z.
- 32V4C or 32MQH7000Z: which is rated better?
- 32V4C is rated higher (4.3 vs 4).
- What's the difference in refresh Rate between 32V4C and 32MQH7000Z?
- 32V4C has refresh Rate 120, while 32MQH7000Z has refresh Rate 60.
- What's the difference in energy Class between 32V4C and 32MQH7000Z?
- 32V4C has energy Class F, while 32MQH7000Z has energy Class E.